Yesterday, as I was scrolling X (formerly Twitter), I came across a post highlighting a new project, SuperFanVerse. While I usually don’t pay much heed to such tweets, this one caught my attention!
It detailed how parents are using SuperFanVerse to post photos and videos of their underage children, which is available to other users for a subscription fee, ranging from $100/month to over $13,200 annually.
That’s not the shocking part though. What I witnessed next blew my mind. There were photos and videos of underage girls in swimwear for the world to see, of course at a cost.
So, I decided to dive deep into SuperFanVerse to understand its model and how it could promote such acts, let alone permit it. Keep reading to find out!
Table of Contents
What is SuperFanVerse and how it affects youngsters?
I first created an account on SuperFanVerse. To do so, you only need an email address and suprsingly there’s no email verification in place.
Post-account creation, I was greeted with a screen that read, “We are verifying your profile. Please be patient.” Naturally, I checked my email address for any updates from SuperFanVerse. There was a single email that said the same thing as the initial screen. So, I waited!
Then, roughly three hours later, I received an update. My account had been activated. I wasn’t even asked for a verification code, as is usually the case with email verification on popular platforms.
I headed back to SuperFanVerse, and I was in. It listed various profiles on the right, the central Feed portion possibly reserved for accounts that I am subscribed to. For me, it will remain this way till the end.
Next, I scrolled through the profiles on the right, and most were adults. No problems until now. In my opinion, adults sharing steamy pictures and videos on the web isn’t a problem. They are entitled to make their decision as long as it doesn’t affect others.
Then came the shocking part, something that was mentioned in the Twitter post. I came across a profile of an underage girl with pictures that shouldn’t be up for subscription-based viewing. I then looked at the subscription plans, and there was just one priced at $100/month.
As I had previously heard, the account bio mentioned that it was managed by the child’s parents. The entire bio read
Welcome Super Fans! I’m so happy that you’re here to follow me on my journey. I love dancing, modeling, fashion, Starbucks, & anything pink. I’m just a city girl who’s all about spreading good vibes! Follow all my social media accounts: Instagram, TikTok, & YouTube. This account is mom managed. Please be respectful! Inappropriate comments and DM’s will be blocked. No custom sets or requests. All pictures and videos are protected by SuperFanVerse and copyright laws. No selling, sharing, or editing allowed.
In the next half an hour, I came across several other profiles of underage girls. You could easily identify these from the bio. It usually has a phrase like “Mom managed” or “Mom monitored“. Most profiles had links to their Instagram accounts embedded, with the latter, too, filled with similar photos.
What baffled me more was the sheer number of such profiles, with there being no mechanism to regulate it. Because let’s be honest, it’s adults who are paying for these subscription plans to view such content. How could parents put their children in such a vulnerable position and how could SuperFanVerse let them platform it?
So, I checked SuperFanVerse’s Help & FAQ section which mentions,
Superfanverse is a fan monetizing platform that allows you to start your own premium content-based account in no time. It allows you to post premium content, which can only be unlocked by other viewers when purchasing a monthly subscription. On top of that, creators can earn more money from tips and paid posts, on top of of the regular subscription content.
Again, so far so good. No mention of SuperFanVerse allowing people under the age of 18 to register as content creators. But, when I headed to the Become a Creator section within Settings, it says,
Junior creators under the age of 18 are also required to send a parental consent form.
So, SuperFanVerse indeed allows creators under 18 to join the platform and post exclusive content available to users at a subscription.
Even asking for a consent form doesn’t make much sense here because, more often than not, it’s the parents abetting their children into this and not the other way around. Besides, how could you possibly get consent from 14-year-olds who don’t yet fully understand the repercussions of their actions?
There are numerous cases of child actors and creators who grew up to resent their initial path, one chosen by their families. Could SuperFanVerse or the parents managing these underage creators’ profiles guarantee that these won’t feel the same way?
If not, then the platform should be shut down or compelled to delete the accounts of underage content creators. Anyone above the age of 18 (or the legal age in their region) should be free to become a creator or an active subscriber, but underage creators should absolutely be banned!
What are people saying about SuperFanVerse?
While my initial reaction was to force SuperFanVerse to delete profiles of underage creators, I wondered whether others felt the same way. So, I searched forums to find out how people globally viewed SuperFanVerse. Here’s what a few had to say, and some made valid points:
Well if they are just selling pictures of children who are clothed it’s going to be legal. While disgusting for both buyer and seller, it’s completely legal.
Sick, no one is paying 13k a year for a cute photo of a kid,
Prosecute the parents for child endangerment,
Kid can’t make a contract at that age, parents who are at fault… seriously sick world
There have been less overt versions of this on other platforms like Facebook and Instagram. It’s usually dance/gymnastics moms selling pics of their kids in skimpy leotards, jumping in splits or lifting their legs to their foreheads and other such stuff. They get these sponsored “contracts“ from leotard companies and the like; more clicks equally more money, and the moms and girls fight for that exposure. It’s actually a competitive venture apart from the actual athletic one, and much more lucrative.
If they are doing this shit. They are doing worse. They need to be investigated.
Is SuperFanVerse popular right now?
The platform’s popularity was another aspect I was highly curious about. How many have registered on the platform, the number of active users, users who had paid for a subscription, and users with multiple subscriptions? While all this information is not available, I could find out the the number of monthly visitors.
To check the monthly user traffic of SuperFanVerse, I relied on the Similarweb extension. According to Similarweb, SuperFanVerse got roughly 35k visits in Feb’25, 36.4k visits in Jan’25, and 24.2k visits in Dec’24.
Since Similarweb is not entirely accurate, my estimates are that the traffic would be 0.7x the given figures, i.e., 24.5k in Feb and 25.5k in Jan.
Looking at these numbers, I wouldn’t call SuperFanVerse popular, and the growth rate in the past few months hasn’t been exemplary either.
Now that you know all about SuperFanVerse, tell us whether it should permit underage creators or their parents to register on the platform.
Before you leave, read our investigation into Soul AI, a project claiming to offer freelance roles with unbelievably high payouts!
